By: Mark Chamberlain, PhD
When I worked at a preschool for autistic children, we went through a peculiar routine every time one of them failed to follow directions.
“Kevin, it’s time to clean up.” Little Kevin was oblivious. “Kevin, please put your toy away.” He kept playing with the truck. “Kevin, you need to put your toy away.” No response.
Now it was my job to walk over and guide little Kevin’s body through the motions of cleaning up. “Kevin, it’s time to clean up.” Placing my hand over his, I’d guide his hand down and help him pick up the toy truck with it. I would them walk him over to the toy bin and help him drop the truck in. There you go Kevin. That’s the way we clean up.
With that, we would have been done-if I’d had my way.
But I wasn’t in charge. I was following a treatment program. So instead of getting on with the reading activity that was next on the schedule, I’d pick up the little truck, walk Kevin back over to where he’d been playing, and drop the truck on the ground again, where we repeated the whole thing.
“Kevin, it’s time to clean up.” The guiding of his hand, the picking up of the toy, the walking to the bin, and the dropping of the toy in the right place.
Then we did it again. And again. For a total of ten reps. If you’re thinking, “Wow, that would get old,” you’re right. It got really old.
But drudgery was not the goal. I wasn’t punishing Kevin into submission. Push the little Sisyphus’s rock down the hill again and make him do it all over again.
The developer of our program, Dr. Ivar Lovaas, knew that impaired nervous systems need more repetition in order to acquire skills and generate them independently when they’re called for. It wasn’t enough for Kevin’s mentally distant mind to know what he needed to do next. His brain and body needed to be conditioned: This instruction goes with this behavior. See, this instruction goes with this behavior. And, as if that weren’t enough, this instruction… You get the idea.
The principle of repetitive conditioning can be very helpful to those of us in the habit of repeatedly engaging in self-destructive behavior.
In the throes of a craving, our nervous systems are impaired, in a way. We are mentally distant, not unlike little Kevin. It’s as though the mind’s in a thick forest, and can only see one path from here: succumbing to the urge.
Every time you take that path in the heat of the moment and end up acting out, why not go back to that forest after things have cooled off and make a few practice runs, mentally? Imagine taking a better path, one you hope to take in the future.
Olivia was excited to practice this exercise. She’d relapsed four days ago. I had her imagine sitting at the computer again and having the urge to view pornography. She dwelt on that for 30 seconds. Then she imagined standing up, walking out of her dorm room, and then outside for some fresh air. She repeated to herself these thoughts, which we’d come up with earlier:
“Walking away feels good now and builds strength for later.”
“I won’t have to suffer the usual guilt and discouragement.”
“It will feel good to have conquered this problem by the time I leave for summer break.”
She spent time dwelling on each thought and associating it with the trigger situation: being alone in her dorm room with the urge to view pornography.
Then, she thought about a second scenario where she found pornography tempting: watching TV late at night. After thirty seconds of focusing on it, she imagined standing up, turning off the TV, and walking into the bathroom to get ready for bed.
“Walking away feels good now and builds strength for later.”
“I won’t have to suffer the usual guilt and discouragement.”
“It will feel good to have conquered this problem by the time I leave for summer break.”
Olivia practiced imagining being in a state of craving and then taking a different path this way for ten minutes a day over the next month. It built her capacity for standing up to cravings and making a different choice in the heat of the moment.
I often speak with parents of young adults about their concerns with their children marrying someone who might have a pornography problem. Many of these parents, especially fathers, wonder if it’s their right to do some investigating to see if their child is dating someone who struggles with pornography. I can certainly understand their concern, as that one specific behavior will have a potentially devastating impact on their child and future grandchildren. There are two main questions to consider here. First, is it the right of the parent to ask a potential in-law if they are struggling with pornography? Second, if it is appropriate, how should they approach this conversation?
I believe that it’s the parent’s privilege to counsel with their adult children’s romantic partners before marriage. However, there is one important factor that will determine how much influence a parent will have in this arena. If the parent has a healthy and mutually respectful relationship with their adult child, then there is a greater likelihood that they will encourage parental involvement in that decision-making process. On the other hand, if the parent is emotionally disconnected from their adult child and is either aloof or forceful, this involvement might only create more problems. So, before there is any discussion about whether or not a parent should be involved, it’s best to examine the nature of the parent/child relationship to see if there is even a healthy space to begin discussing such a sensitive issue.
As a child matures, a parents moves from the position of a “manager” of the child’s life to becoming more of an “influencer” of their child’s life. A parent, through respect and regard for the child’s growing independence and decision-making, earns this position of influence. When the time comes for a child to make a decision about marriage, the parent should already have a long history of being there for the child when the child is navigating difficult decisions.
If the adult child has an emotionally connected relationship with her parents, then it’s likely there have already been discussions about her relationship with her fiancé. The parents will most likely already know something about his family, his interests, and may even have had an opportunity to spend time with him in family settings.
Not only does a parent need to have a healthy relationship with their child, but they also need to begin building a relationship with their child’s romantic partner so they can have the trust necessary to ultimately talk about such sensitive things. Not only will this relationship serve as the foundation of trust for the conversation, it will also promote more honesty and candor from the fiancé.
When it is time to discuss this issue with their child and/or the romantic partner, an already-established relationship will allow for a more natural transition to the topic. Additionally, the question of the fiance’s pornography use won’t simply be a “yes” or “no” response. Instead, it will open up a dialogue about the issue where a real conversation on the topic can take place.
In part two of this article, I will give specific suggestions on how a parent can go about discussing this sensitive topic with their child’s fiancé.
This is one site you’ll want to bookmark and check every day for the next few months. It’s a media blitz by several media companies, including KSL-TV, KSL-Web, Deseret News, and Deseret Book to educate those victimized by pornography and sexual addiction. There are videos, articles, and a ton of other resources to help.
I am excited to announce that the Utah Coalition Against Pornography (UCAP) will present a Southern Utah Regional conference on November 6, 2010 from 9am - 1pm here in St. George, UT.
The conference will feature experts from around the nation who are working to educate parents, clergy, and the public about the dangers of pornography. The conference will carry the same title as the previous UCAP conferences.
Stay tuned for more details as we finalize the list of presenters. Previous UCAP conferences can be purchased on DVD from the UCAP website.