Mar 29, 2016

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

How pornography destroys your sex life

Posted at December 12th, 2013
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Categories: Uncategorized
No Comments »

naomi-wolf-1How porn is destroying modern sex lives: Feminist writer Naomi Wolf has an unsettling explanation for why Britons are having less sex
By Naomi Wolf

  • Couples are having 20% less sex than they did just ten years ago
  • Wolf connects this to the rise of pornography
  • Porn poses health problems…
  • It desensitizes those who watch it and has long-term consequences
  • As a result, it has a negative effect on sex and relationships

These days, I am rarely surprised when, after a lecture or book signing, someone will try to talk to me about their addiction to porn and ask where he or she can get help. As an author and feminist social commentator, I often discuss my work at events and meet a wide spectrum of people who talk to me about sex, relationships and, more increasingly, the impact of pornography on their lives. There is no stereotype of what this person will look like. A man in his 60s has asked me if I think his porn addiction accounts for his current impotence.

A major study has revealed that British couples are having about 20% less sex than they did just ten years ago. A lovely young mother of three boys asked sadly how her husband, in an otherwise happy, sexually fulfilled marriage, became ‘lost to porn’ to the point that she had to leave him. She now wonders how to protect her sons. A bright, male college student confessed that he is worried about what he calls ‘the kink spiral’ - the term he uses to describe feeling trapped by his need to see more and more extreme porn to get aroused - the fact he needs more and more extreme, violent or fetishistic porn images in order to get aroused.

Couples in their late teens tell me no one they know can have sex without porn playing on a screen. A guidance counsellor at a private school asks where he can find help for his students - many of whom are so addicted to online porn that the obsession is affecting their schoolwork and social development.

As someone who has been researching in this field for over 20 years, I believe we must take seriously the rise of pornography. New research shows it is having a detrimental effect on men’s and women’s sexual responses and harming relationships as a consequence.

My latest book, Vagina: A New Biography, about female sexual desire, has a chapter on new discoveries in neuroscience that show how pornography negatively affects both sex and relationships.

Popular culture is reflecting this trend: the new film Don Jon centers on porn addiction. The hero is sleeping with Scarlett Johansson but sneaks off to watch porn, since he says nothing with a real woman (even Johansson!) is as good. Meanwhile, sex scenes in mainstream movies are getting more violent. In The Kids Are All Right, I was startled to see Julianne Moore’s character start slapping her partner’s face as he neared orgasm.

Young women tell me that hair-pulling, and even pressure around the neck at orgasm, are normal parts of courtship sex these days. These are ‘porn cliches’, as one young woman put it. I am not surprised by these shifts because we all know about the pornification of society.

I believe more voices would be speaking out if the new research on this issue were better understood. What we’re not being told - and this is a view which many scientists now confirm, but too few ordinary people understand - is that porn use poses health problems.

Mine is not a moral position. I think adults should be able see whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes (if the images are not based on a crime or any cruelty being committed).

Yet the neuroscience of porn addiction is clear: watching porn causes sharp spikes in the activation of dopamine, a neurotransmitter in the brain, which makes people feel focused, confident and good.

The trouble is that this short-term neurological arousal has long-term consequences. Firstly, it can cause desensitization to the same erotic simuli that turned you on recently and, over the longer term, it can cause a greater likelihood of sexual dysfunction.

The user then craves more and more extreme pornography - violence and taboo images activate the autonomic nervous system, which is involved with arousal - in order to reach that same level of excitement.

This acclimatization and desensitization explains why images that were seen as fetishistic, taboo or violent ten years ago are now mainstream fare on porn sites.

A second effect, confirmed with men and anecdotal with women, is trouble reaching orgasm. Doctors are now reporting an epidemic of healthy young and middle-aged men, with no disease or psychological issue that would otherwise explain their difficulties, who are having sexual problems such as impotence or delayed ejaculation due to this desensitization.

A final problem related to desensitization is that men start to see their own partners as less attractive, and less able to arouse them by ordinary sexual behavior.

And, of course, one woman can’t provide the ever-changing novelty, that constantly renewed boost to the brain that porn artificially delivers by a mouse click of the mouse.

There are other ways porn use can negatively affect female arousal. If a woman feels uneasy about her partner’s use of porn the stress of her resentment and anger can affect her own ability to become aroused.

If you understand the neuroscience of female arousal, women need to have their autonomic nervous systems (heart rate, breathing, blood circulation) highly activated to get turned on. Emotions such as stress,anger, a sense of threat and resentment can function like throwing a bucket of freezing water on the female system.

I have also done a lot of research into the fact that sex portrayed in most porn does not teach men, especially young men, sexual skills that are useful in arousing women. As Dr Jim Pfaus, a pioneer in the field of the science of sexual behavior from Canada’s Concordia University, puts it, porn use can take an emotional toll on relationships because men who use it are ‘neurologically bonding’ not with their partners, but with the porn.

Relationship expert and couples’ counsellor Michael Kallenbach says: ‘Couples are far more aware of porn now than they’ve ever been. With everyone owning iPhones and tablets and being constantly bombarded with sexy ads and imagery, porn is leaking into our lives and affecting our relationships.

‘When one partner watches surreptitiously, it’s a very dangerous avenue to go down. Their imagination, and relationship, will be put at the mercy of fantasy. This often results in affairs.’

A recent University of Sydney study, in which two professors surveyed more than 800 men, found that excessive porn consumption was reported by almost half the respondents (85 per cent of whom were married or in a relationship), and was harming their professional success and relationships.

The numbers were dramatic: 47??per cent of the male subjects watched between 30 minutes to three hours of porn per day, one in three said it harmed their work efforts, and one in five would rather watch porn than have sex with their partners.

I can understand why the porn industry is keen to keep the addictive nature of its products quiet and promote the libertarian notion that there are no consequences. It is a global industry that wishes to turn men, and increasingly women, into addicts for financial reasons.

The situation very much resembles the marketing of cigarettes without health warnings in the Sixties.

So why isn’t government-mandated disclosure of the risks obligatory, as it is now with cigarettes?

The answer is our politicians don’t yet fully understand the damage that is being done.

Recently, the Daily Mail won a victory whereby the Government agreed that all households should opt in if they want to be able to view porn on the internet.

I believe that with good health information, people can make more informed choices about how, when, and if they want to use porn, and even better choices about what kind of imagery they might seek out or avoid.

Those who wish to end their addiction - like ending any addiction - can do so with effort.

Men who have done so - that is for whom we have data - report a great sense of regaining psychological control, and heightened arousal with their wives or girlfriends. Mostly they are relieved not to be at the mercy of something that many of those who write to me feel they need - but don’t especially like.

Are we ‘sexually liberated’ if porn is taking over our thought processes and corroding our ability to sustain meaningful relationships? I think we are less sexually free.

A powerful industry is manipulating us - and ruthlessly exploiting some hard-wiring in the male brain - to turn us more and more into sexual and emotional robots, only capable of achieving sexual fulfillment in a room with a computer, alone.

 

Fighting Against Pornography- Part 3

Posted at August 1st, 2013
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - - - - - - -
Categories: Couples Pornography Addiction Recovery, General Sexual Addiction, In the news/media, Partners of pornography addicts, Pornography Addiction, Protecting Children from Pornography, Protecting Families from Pornography, Shame, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »

Editor’s note: The following story deals with sexually-themed subject matter that will not be appropriate for some readers. Discretion is advised.

This is part three in a four-part series. Read part one: “Ubiquitous assailant: The dangerous unasked questions surrounding pornography.” Read part two: “Second-hand porn: the spreading circle of damage.” Read part four: “How couples break the cycle of addiction.”

As she flips through the sex offense cases for the Metropolitan Police in Reykjavik, Iceland, assistant prosecutor Sigridur Hjaltested shakes her head.

A 15-year-old girl pressured into having sex with three boys.

One of the boys was 15. The other two were even younger.

Recently, Hjaltested filed charges in the case of a woman in her 20s who was expecting a sexual encounter with a man in his 30s, yet suddenly the man’s friend showed up and demanded to take part.

The charge was rape using violence and unlawful pressure.

There’s nothing new about sex crimes, but over the last five years, the sexual offenses division in Reykjavik has seen crimes that are more graphic, violent, and perpetrated by younger and younger individuals.

“The sexual offense cases we get bear more (resemblance) to hard-core sex and a sex culture that is rapidly changing,” Hjaltested said. “I do not think that is a good development.”

Distribution of pornography has been illegal in the liberal, socially progressive Nordic country since it was codified in 1940, but “porn” wasn’t defined and enforcement has been sporadic due to a lack of resources. Because the majority of today’s pornography is accessed online, Iceland’s former minister of the interior proposed a bill that would legally define pornography with references to violence and humiliation rather than nudity and sexually explicitness — thus making most of today’s mainstream violent Internet porn illegal.

“There are great concerns that violent porn has blurred the line between sex and violence,” said Ögmundur Jónasson, who sponsored the proposal during his tenure as minister of the interior, which ended with the country’s April elections. “A broad consensus has developed in Iceland where we agree that the current situation is not acceptable.” Jónasson had organized a committee that was considering making it illegal to buy porn using Icelandic credit cards, or creating a national blacklist of pornographic websites — but opponents pointed out problems ranging from technological hurdles and false labeling of good websites to concerns over censorship. It’s unknown whether the new government will pursue the bill.

Any country wishing to prevent the spread of pornography faces similar questions now that pornography has exploded from brick-and-mortar products to ever-accessible Internet offerings.

Like Iceland, the United States also has laws that ban obscenity — a legally defined, albeit contested, subset of pornography — but they’re not being enforced, experts say.

“In theory it’s possible for the government to enforce them,” says Eugene Volokh, a professor of First Amendment law at UCLA School of Law. “It’s just that there’s been very little political appetite to do that, with changing social mores … coupled with a sense that it’s extremely unlikely that this is going to do any good.”

Experts like Volokh point out that prosecutions may be decreasing because the laws intended to prosecute obscenity were a bit vague to begin with and are even more muddled now that offenders are predominantly online.

Others, like Patrick Trueman, president and CEO of Morality in Media and chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section in the Department of Justice from 1988-1993, point to a successful history of obscenity prosecutions in the country and say there’s no reason existing laws can’t be used to prosecute Internet offenders — especially if the public steps up and once again demands legal action.

“I don’t think that obscenity is no longer prosecutable — it is,” says Robert Showers, founder of the National Law Center for Children and Families and chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity section at the Department of Justice in the 1980s. “But it would take, quite frankly, an avalanche of public sentiment … saying, ‘We’re not putting up with this anymore.'”

LOCAL BATTLES

Fourteen years ago in a Provo courtroom, defense attorney Randy Spencer asked a jury of Utah County residents to consider the following numbers:

 

19,389 adult pay-per-view movies rented from DirectTV in three years.

 

 

1,416 adult pay-per-view movies purchased during a nine-month test run of “Spice TV” in Provo, Spanish Fork and Payson. (Response was so good corporate headquarters wanted the local affiliate to offer “Playboy TV” as well.)

 

 

20 percent of profits at Orem movie store Sun Coast Video came from adult video sales — only 2.5 percent of its total inventory.

 

 

3,444 non-cable-edited X-rated movies purchased by patrons at the Marriott Hotel — literally across the street from the courthouse.

 

How could the county charge his client Larry W. Peterman with violating community standards of decency, Spencer asked the jury, when Utah County residents themselves had accepted, albeit clandestinely, adult entertainment being sold in their malls and viewed in their homes?

Peterman was acquitted on all charges.

Results like that make prosecutors hesitant to file porn cases, says Raymond Robertson, the Commonwealth’s Attorney for Staunton, Va., and one of the last prosecutors to successfully get an obscenity conviction against a pornographer over the last decade.

“I don’t know if they’re too busy, or they don’t care, or they think the law is one thing when it’s actually another,” he said. “But the law is pretty clear and it’s clearly on the side of … if it’s obscene, it’s illegal.”

The law he’s talking about is called the Miller test, a 1973 Supreme Court decision that defined obscenity using a three-prong test: Would the average community member find that the material in question appeals to a morbid or degrading interest in sex? Does it show or describe sexual content in a patently offensive way? And then, considering a broader, nationwide audience, does it lack literary, artistic, political or scientific merit?

If the answers are yes, then the material is obscene, regardless of who used it, how they used it, where they used it, and how pervasive it is around them, Robertson says, emphasizing that prosecutors have to stand firm on those prongs and avoid getting derailed by defense attorney’s arguments about free speech and tolerance.

The Free Speech Coalition, the trade association for the adult entertainment industry, has a different perspective on the law.

“The more people there are who enjoy adult entertainment, the harder it becomes to make the argument that adult entertainment is patently offensive to the average person,” the trade group argued in its most recent report on the state of the industry. “If adult entertainment is, in fact, widely accepted by mainstream populations, then the use of criminal obscenity law to regulate it is unconstitutional.”

FEDERAL FIGHTS

As Mary Beth Buchanan, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, initiated an obscenity case against a Los Angeles-based pornographer in 2003, the letters began pouring into her office.

“How can you, as an attorney in Pittsburgh, prosecute a couple in California?”

“Obscenity laws still exist?”

“With all the other problems we face, why are we spending taxpayers’ money fighting porn?”

And her favorite: “Thanks for tackling this. Good luck.”

The public’s confusion and surprise was understandable and even part of her motivation, Buchanan said. The grand jury indictment of Extreme Associates and owners Robert Zicari (aka Rob Black) and Janet Romano (aka Lizzy Borden) represented the first federal obscenity case filed in nearly 10 years.

“Bringing these cases will remind the public that we do have laws that prohibit obscenity and those laws are enforceable,” Buchanan said. “If (people) find this material, they don’t have to accept it; they don’t have to tolerate it; they can bring it to law enforcement.”

Federal law prohibits selling, mailing, transporting, broadcasting, producing or transferring obscene material — which Extreme Associates was doing by mailing DVDs to a local Pennsylvania retailer, as well as offering Internet material that was being accessed in the community.

The couple was charged with 10 counts of production and distribution of obscene pornographic materials by mail and the Internet, which carried the potential for 50 years in prison and/or a $2.5 million fine.

Buchanan charged headlong into the case, relying on years of experience prosecuting child pornographers to propel her through six years of legal procedure that included a dismissal and a successful appeal to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, which returned the case to the district court. The case ended with guilty pleas and a yearlong prison sentence for each defendant.

“I don’t recall any other case during my entire career that took that much time and effort to obtain a judgment or conviction,” Buchanan said. “When I compare this to all the drug and gun cases we did at this time, this one case had as much impact on the pornography industry … as hundreds of cases in some other area.”

For a long time after the victory, Buchanan would get calls from defense attorneys who represented pornographers, asking if they were advising their clients correctly on what would and wouldn’t fly in their films.

“What that showed me is they were taking the law seriously, which they had not for many years,” Buchanan said. “They recognized that the law was still in effect, prosecutors were paying attention to it, and if producers violated it, there would be consequences.”

During the end of Ronald Reagan’s presidency and the beginning of George H.W. Bush’s, adult obscenity prosecution was in full swing at the federal level, leading to a decrease in hardcore pornography and a sense of hesitancy on the part of pornographers, says Trueman, who headed up the Department of Justice office for years. Such success proved the laws were effective.

Yet, the Department of Justice hasn’t filed an adult obscenity case since 2010.

The most recent adjudication came in January, when Ira Isaacs, a self-proclaimed “shock artist,” was sentenced to four years in prison for his obscene films featuring bestiality and an obsession with feces.

Yet his case was filed six years ago, and had been winding through mountains of legal motions and three jury trials to get to the recent finish line.

“The department has brought numerous obscenity prosecutions in recent years, including the recent case against Ira Isaacs,” said Peter Carr, Department of Justice spokesman. “However, we have focused our limited investigative and prosecutorial resources on the most egregious cases, particularly those that facilitate child exploitation and cases involving the sexual abuse of children, including obscene depictions of child rape. For that reason, the significant majority of the federal obscenity cases we have charged involve the exploitation of children.”

Along with prosecuting child pornography, federal law also prohibits knowingly distributing obscenity to minors, as well as creating misleading web addresses or web images designed to deceive children into viewing pornography.

Child porn is one area where the government can focus its resources and rest assured that their enforcement activities are going to stand up to the scrutiny of the law, says Marcia Hofmann, an attorney who specializes in Internet law.

“There’s a tremendously strong interest in protecting children,” she says. “When the law enforcement starts to go into areas where there is less of a compelling interest, then there’s a great fear … of getting in a big fight over whether prosecution is OK.”

And this is where the public could step in and show prosecutors there’s still a compelling interest to prosecute, says Trueman. After all, law enforcement operates off of complaints, he says.

“If you don’t like the situation, if you don’t like a porn shop in your town, contact the district attorney. Make sure their phones ring off the hook,” he says. “But the public isn’t doing that. They haven’t done that for many years.”

Perhaps it’s because many feel the battle against the spread of pornography is futile, says Volokh.

“If a prosecutor wants to prosecute distributors of online porn under Miller, there’s a good chance he’ll get a conviction,” Volokh says. “But if the goal of the prosecutor is to make porn less accessible, that’s what’s not possible. One thing that we have found, is that in free countries, it’s hard to stop the spread of things that people want to consume.”

The government could try to install something like a nationwide China-like firewall, (which would incur massive opposition) or begin monitoring ISPs and the raid the homes of people acquiring obscenity, which is legal to possess, but not to acquire or transport. It would be a rare, but legal charge, too draconian “even for people who’d like to wave a magic wand and have all porn gone,” Volokh says.

But enforcing existing law isn’t draconian, it’s responsible, Buchanan insists. Yes, it’s difficult and requires significant time and energy, but it sends a message to the public, to pornographers and to other prosecutors that obscenity is taken seriously and that the laws written to enforce it are still being used.

“To bring these cases is important because it reminds the people in the community that it is their choice on what material they find offensive, and what material they think that the law applies to,” she says. “If they don’t speak up, then prosecutors won’t know that this type of material is material that they don’t want in their communities.”

What YOU can do:

 

Communicate with local law enforcement and prosecutors as well as state prosecutors about establishments or Internet sites you find offensive and problematic

 

 

Write letters or call companies that use sexually explicit advertising and express your concern and determination to shop elsewhere

 

 

Refuse to support companies that make money off of distributing pornography. For information on such companies visit pornharms.com/dirtydozen

 

 

Become educated about the applicable obscenity laws in your state and at the federal level

 

 

Become educated about pornography and pornography addiction

 

 

Talk to youths about sexuality and appropriate expressions of intimacy

 

 

Install filters on computers, phones, gaming systems and cable systems to prevent exposure to pornography

Making Self Care a Priority

Posted at August 1st, 2013
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - -
Categories: Pornography Addiction, self-care, Uncategorized
No Comments »

Making self-care a priority

By Jon Worlton, LCSW

LifeStar therapist

 

I recently listened to a prominent religious leader use the analogy of fly fishing when teaching about Satanic efforts to “hook” and destroy human lives. Fly fishermen carefully get to know the habits and patterns of their prey. They design lures to mimic insects that fish are eating and also fish at times when fish are most active and hungry. In short, fly fisherman learn about and manipulate their prey’s needs.

Whether or not one believes in God or the Devil, it is hard to disagree with the reality of “lures” in our environment that will limit our freedom and ultimately destroy our lives. Addictions are the most common lures that hook and trap individuals. Addictions are a powerful and effective way of soothing emotional distress and satisfying unmet needs. Even though the relief is temporary, the experience the user is having feels authentic. Unfortunately, the emotionally “hungrier” one is, the more enticing the lure of the addiction. On the flip side, the more our real emotional needs have been met, the easier it becomes to discern between an artificial lure and something that will be healthy and nourishing.

The first way to begin meeting these important emotional needs is the engage in healthy self-care. Self-care is the intentional practice of meeting our needs in healthy and nourishing ways. Early in my work with the LifeStar program, I heard recovery summarized as deliberately creating healthy rituals which nourish, strengthen, and renew our individual energy. This renewal allows us to make meaningful contributions to our relationships. It is important for all of us to deliberately identify and practice self-care activities.

 

A blogger named Stephanie Neilson (http://nieniedialogues.blogspot.com/2010/10/3-simple-steps.html) listed the following things she does for self care:

 

1. Make a “Quiet Time” sign and put it on my front door when I need a nap, or down time with the boys. There is no reason why quiet signs just have to be for napping children.?I suggest you take full advantage of it too.

2. I make home a priority. Nothing ever comes before my family time. Nothing.

3. I leave at least one day a week of nothing. No house-work, yard work, errands, shopping, computer, and cooking (among other things). Life just comes as it comes.

 

While these are examples specific to a stay-at-home mother of small children, you can clearly see the priority she places on protecting and caring for those areas that will allow her to be more emotionally present for her loved ones.

In addition to personal self-care, relational care is also critical. Todd Olson and Dan Gray, founders of the LifeStar program, suggest the following for relationship care:

 

  1. A weekly date with your spouse that doesn’t include recovery/addiction talk.
  2. Weekly service (do one deliberate thing each week for your spouse)
  3. A monthly gift to your spouse (doesn’t have to be expensive).

Of The Heart

Posted at June 20th, 2013
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - - - - - - - -
Categories: General Sexual Addiction, Protecting Families from Pornography, PTSD, Shame, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »

In recovery work, we learn a lot about toxic shame. Toxic shame is the feeling that we are deeply flawed, inadequate, and therefore, unworthy of being accepted and loved. Toxic shame is like being plunged into darkness, with a very limited view of yourself and your abilities. Even worse, it hijacks your sense of being accepted, and so you resort to staying in the dark versus reaching for connection. Like being stuck in deep mud, it takes work to be pulled out and redirected when we are in shame. There is another form of self-evaluation that is much more productive and gives rise to a desire for change. This feeling is called guilt. When we feel guilt, we are aware that our actions do not match our values. Unlike shame that makes us feel inadequate and stuck, guilt spurs a sense that we are motivated for change. Guilt is a connecting emotion: When we feel guilt, we know that our actions are incongruent with our values. So does addiction affect our ability to feel guilty? Yes, it does, but the good news is that as recovery takes place, we re-connect to our values and to empathy. It becomes easier to access a sense of guilt when a mistake is made, and we feel more capable of getting back on track. When we feel the shift of our values and a stronger sense of empathy and compassion, we call this a change of heart. You’ve probably heard the adage, “you can’t serve two masters.” Well, without a heart change, or a change of being, it becomes impossible to make a long-term change in what we are doing. Allow your heart change to happen. It will mean saying goodbye to things like lust, bitter resentment, shame, isolation, and unworthiness. It will mean embracing connection, congruency, acceptance, and that you are worthy of something better. Dr. Mark Laaser explained it this way, “In healing from sexual addiction, if all we do is defend, we grow tired and discouraged. We must also build into our lives new behaviors, attitudes, relationships, and spirituality. We are building new lives, new marriages, and we are always searching for new and deeper ways to connect to God and others. We need to be just as accountable to do the good- rebuilding- as we are accountable to refrain from doing the behaviors we hate.” Wishing you the very best in your recovery! – Amy Cluff, LCSW

Pornography is anti-healthy sexuality

Posted at July 15th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - - - -
Categories: Pornography Addiction, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »

 

Dr. Mary Anne Layden, Director of Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology program, University of Pennsylvania, discusses the frequents criticisms against the anti-pornography movement. Her point? We’re not against healthy sexuality. We’re against toxic sexuality.

 

New Getting Started Workshop - August 7th, 2012

Posted at June 30th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Categories: Uncategorized
No Comments »

The relapse journey

Posted at May 16th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - -
Categories: Pornography Addiction, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
1 Comment »

The relapse journey
By Geoff Steurer, MS, LMFT

I once spoke with a man who had a serious setback in his sexual addiction recovery about the events of his relapse. As we talked about the details, he said something that caught my attention. He said, “it’s amazing how far you can go in just a few minutes.”

Now, on the surface, I understood what he was trying to say. He recognized that in the few minutes acting out sexually, he crossed lines he never intended to cross. However, after working with men in recovery from sexual addiction for years, I knew that his relapse didn’t begin and end in a few minutes.

The shame and denial that follows a relapse can be compared to an aggressive public relations campaign following a disaster. The horror of seeing the consequences from acting out is more than most individuals can tolerate. So, the whole event gets reduced to a minimum and then the addict doesn’t have to feel like he was really out of control or, worse that he failed. But, like actual damage control campaigns corporations engineer to save their image, attempts to reduce a significant relapse to a simple “whoops” only kills credibility.

To say that a relapse simply lasted a few minutes is technically true when you count the actual minutes it took to cross the final boundary. However, I’ve never seen a relapse that began and ended in a few minutes. Most relapses begin days and weeks before the more serious lines are crossed.

A relapse is a long journey that begins by ignoring warning signals in the following areas: Physical, emotional, relational, sexual, and spiritual. These warning signals are often subtle and easily rationalized, or worse, ignored. However, they serve an important purpose for the recovering individual. The feedback from these warning signals provide direction for the constant course corrections needed in long-term recovery.

For example, Paul hated the stress of his commission-only job as a car salesman. Even though he was a natural at sales, the constant worry about how much his check would be every month was taking its toll on him. He didn’t want his wife to worry about their financial security, so he would confidently report on a daily basis that work was going great. It was tough for him to keep up the façade. In fact, he actually would work longer hours in an attempt to scrape together more income. He became more moody at home as he began to crack under the pressure. Eventually, he began having more conflict with his wife who didn’t understand why he was being so negative. The isolation and disconnection opened him up to more opportunities to view pornography and escape into a world of mind-numbing fantasy.

Let’s review how Paul’s relapse developed. First, he ignored the emotional signals from the stress at work. He felt overwhelmed, inadequate, afraid, and powerless. His relational dishonesty with his wife created more distance and didn’t allow her to be a support to him in his struggle. He ignored physical signals that he was wearing himself down by overworking.

These three sets of warning signals were providing Paul with an opportunity to make the necessary adjustments to avoid a relapse.

It would be easy for Paul to decide that his relapse was really about being stressed out in the very moment he turned to pornography as a stress reliever. He could tell himself that this was only a small moment of viewing pornography and that he wouldn’t do it again.

The problem, of course, is that because he isn’t aware of the journey he’s been on for months, he will end up back in the same spot again. Paul won’t turn around his direction unless he can acknowledge how many areas are out of balance for him and then take the necessary steps to correct them.

When these early indicators are taken seriously, it’s easy to make corrections and move toward a more congruent and balanced life. An active addiction cannot exist when there is physical, emotional, relational, sexual, and spiritual balance.
Think back to your last setback in your recovery. Which of these five areas were out of balance? Are any of these areas still out of balance? What steps can you take today to begin making the necessary corrections?

Geoff Steurer is a licensed marriage and family therapist and is the founding director of LifeSTAR of St. George – a three-phase recovery program for couples and individuals impacted by pornography and sexual addiction. He is also the co-author of “Love You, Hate the Porn: Healing a Relationship Damaged by Virtual Infidelity.” You can follow Geoff on Twitter: @geoffsteurer or on Facebook: facebook.com/geoffsteurerMFT

Restoring trust after betrayal

Posted at May 16th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - - - - - - - -
Categories: Pornography Addiction, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »

Balanced recovery

Posted at April 16th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - -
Categories: Pornography Addiction, self-care, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »

Geoff Steurer, LMFT, co-author of “Love You, Hate the Porn: Healing a Relationship Damaged by Virtual Infidelity” and founding director of LifeSTAR of St. George discusses how to create a balanced recovery. Healthy recovery from pornography and sexual addiction requires a healthy balance of education, therapy, group support, and self-care. Proper balance ensures that individuals and couples will have the ability to do long-term recovery.

Healthy sexual intimacy in recovery

Posted at March 14th, 2012
Posted by Geoff Steurer
Tags: - - -
Categories: Couples Pornography Addiction Recovery, Pornography Addiction, St. George Utah Pornography Addiction Treatment, Uncategorized
No Comments »